<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Zidane, please don&#8217;t quit!</title>
	<link>http://www.footballspectator.com/2006/07/02/zidane-please-dont-quit/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 01:21:31 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: raktar</title>
		<link>http://www.footballspectator.com/2006/07/02/zidane-please-dont-quit/#comment-113</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jul 2006 10:28:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.footballspectator.com/2006/07/02/zidane-please-dont-quit/#comment-113</guid>
					<description>This website perfectly illustrates the dangers of the internet. It appears that there can be too much of a good thing - i.e. free speech. There should be no room for provocateurs such as yourself on the world wide web. 
Of course, Serbia and Montenegro was the worst team, not just in its group, but in the whole tournament. Yet, what does that have to do with Ronaldo and Ronaldinho!? It is an old populist tactic - go on the attack when you have no point to defend. Your demagoguery does not pass off as analysis or comment in my book. I hope your readers have the common sense to see through this and agree with me.
The mighty Raktar was here!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This website perfectly illustrates the dangers of the internet. It appears that there can be too much of a good thing - i.e. free speech. There should be no room for provocateurs such as yourself on the world wide web.<br />
Of course, Serbia and Montenegro was the worst team, not just in its group, but in the whole tournament. Yet, what does that have to do with Ronaldo and Ronaldinho!? It is an old populist tactic - go on the attack when you have no point to defend. Your demagoguery does not pass off as analysis or comment in my book. I hope your readers have the common sense to see through this and agree with me.<br />
The mighty Raktar was here!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: nick</title>
		<link>http://www.footballspectator.com/2006/07/02/zidane-please-dont-quit/#comment-109</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Jul 2006 21:42:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.footballspectator.com/2006/07/02/zidane-please-dont-quit/#comment-109</guid>
					<description>Raktar it seems you have been watching a different tournament to the rest of us. Ronaldinho did not have a good tournament I agree but Ronaldo a threat? Yes he scored 3 but the old Ronaldo would have scored 6. I suppose you are going to tell us that Serbia &amp; Montenegro were the best team in the Group of death and were unlucky to lose 6-0 to Argentina...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Raktar it seems you have been watching a different tournament to the rest of us. Ronaldinho did not have a good tournament I agree but Ronaldo a threat? Yes he scored 3 but the old Ronaldo would have scored 6. I suppose you are going to tell us that Serbia &#038; Montenegro were the best team in the Group of death and were unlucky to lose 6-0 to Argentina&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: raktar</title>
		<link>http://www.footballspectator.com/2006/07/02/zidane-please-dont-quit/#comment-108</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Jul 2006 21:23:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.footballspectator.com/2006/07/02/zidane-please-dont-quit/#comment-108</guid>
					<description>It seems a shame that there is no drug testing for webmasters. I mean, what is this guy on? Ronaldo was the most dangerous Brazilian player - if anyone should have gone off it is Ronaldinho. Let's have some professionalism from those running this site, not wild-eyed rants with no facts to back them up. Facts - sound familiar?
The mighty Raktar has spoken!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems a shame that there is no drug testing for webmasters. I mean, what is this guy on? Ronaldo was the most dangerous Brazilian player - if anyone should have gone off it is Ronaldinho. Let&#8217;s have some professionalism from those running this site, not wild-eyed rants with no facts to back them up. Facts - sound familiar?<br />
The mighty Raktar has spoken!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
